Click logo to return to home page. ]

 
Home>Forums>Site Polls>Radio Gear Search Within This Topic   
Post Reply   New Topic   
Forum Jump 10 Pages « 9 10
] ] ]
]
Poll Question : What brand of radio gear do you primarily use?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
701 [ 46.83% ]
513 [ 34.27% ]
108 [ 7.21% ]
80 [ 5.34% ]
95 [ 6.35% ]
You can not vote in this poll
]
] ]
] ] ]
]
Author / Post
Avatar User Offline Rickles909
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: February/03/2005
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 1017
IP Logged
Posted: November/24/2007 at 1:38pm  Quote
 
I needed a transmitter with a lot of channels for my B17
project. The Futaba 14MZ was just being released so I took
the plunge and got into one of those very expensive radio
systems. That was about 2 years ago now and I have not
regretted the purchase since. I don't care for the high price
accessories such as the receivers but that's what goes with
a top of the line radio system. One really nice feature is
that you can select any frequency and any type of
transmission (FM, PCM, PCM3) and I could use up 3 pages
talking about the advantages this radio offers to a serious
R/C hobbiest but won't. Just suffice it to say it filled my
needs and many others with the B17. I have also sold all
but one of my previous Tx's since I quit using them. I kept
one TX, a Futaba 8U to use as a buddy box for the 14MZ
and for Amateur band use. I am not real thrilled with
Futaba Digital servos but have never had one go bad on
me. I prefer HiTec servos and have never had any
problems with those either.

__________________
Rickles56
Tucson, AZ

Completed:
> TF Spitfire

On the bench:
> Don Smith B17 - SOLD
> WingSpan Models B17 - Might try Flite Metal on this one.
 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search  Web 
 
Avatar User Offline chookman
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: October/12/2009
National Flag of Australia Australia
Posts: 363
IP Logged
Posted: November/20/2009 at 4:44am  Quote
 
My vote goes to the ever reliable FUtaba..........2.4 of FM

__________________
every day you wake up is a good day





Whirlwind, DC3.Corsair. 60" Me109
62"Typhoon, 66"Do215, B25 Mitchell 72", 52"Hawker Tomtit,

Building Dh 103 Hornet Fairey Firefly. 85" Tempest
 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search 
 
Avatar User Offline xk8fan
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: September/25/2003
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 25
IP Logged
Posted: November/26/2009 at 6:48pm  Quote
 

If there is anyone out there who is maybe moving into 2.4 and has an extra JR 10X Tx or complete system they'd like to sell, I'd be interested.

Please call me at 321-724-2144.    Thanks,  Dave Platt


 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search  Web 
 
Avatar User Offline freddans
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: May/29/2005
National Flag of Sweden Sweden
Posts: 188
IP Logged
Posted: November/26/2009 at 7:32pm  Quote
 
I use a Graupner/JR MC-20.
A few years back, before I got the MC-20, I tried one of Futabas 6-channel radios. That was the crappiest piece of crap I have ever held in my hands. Not only did it empty the batteries in a real hurry, it was awkward to hold. The easiest way to hold it left nothing but the thumbs to hold the sticks with, that is no way to fly... With the "tray-style" transmitter I have both hands free to hold the sticks between my thumbs and indexfingers, the only way I will ever control anything R/C... I know alot of people fly with their thumbs and like it that way. I just know that is not for me.
That transmitter just got to have been a deffective one and not representative for the whole brand in terms of quality or for how long  one batterycharge should last in a typical Futaba transmitter (three hours, from when it was taken off the charger until the batteries were dead, even if the transmitter was 'on' for only a few minutes)
The only way I would ever consider using a "Futaba" transmitter is if it was one of those in a Robbe "tray-style" transmitter case.
JR and Graupner are basically the same inside, just like Robbes transmitters are basically Futaba electronics in a different casing, right?

 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search 
 
Avatar User Offline ohaleynan
Lifetime Site Supporter
Lifetime Site Supporter
Joined: October/01/2007
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 2
IP Logged
Posted: October/09/2010 at 2:57am  Quote
 
Started out with a Futaba 9CAP. I have since acquired a
Futaba 14MZ and am in the process of learning it. Very fun
radio!!!
 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search 
 
Avatar User Offline john62544
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: November/19/2008
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 877
IP Logged
Posted: July/27/2011 at 9:52am  Quote
 

Hi All

    This might sound strange, however, I use Futaba 72 Meg FM for all of my airborne systems. I use Kraft Single Stick Transmitters for many of my aircraft, they work perfectly with Futaba. I also have several Orbit Single Stick Transmitters which I converted to Futaba FM electronics and I also use many Futaba dual stick transmitters with extended custom made right Sticks to make them feel more like a Single Stick Transmitter. Surprisingly when you do this, your flying becomes much more smooth because you're resting your hand on the Transmitter and using two or three fingers on the extended stick with a larger knob on the stick.

    I can fly normal dual sticks, however, I do prefer Single Sticks, unfortunately you can't buy them anymore. I flew all dual sticks on Helicipters when I was seriously into Helicopters many years ago, go figure. I said this would sound strange, but, at my age it's hard to break a habit that you have been doing for some 50 plus years of flying. Oh by the way, I used to fly Reeds until proportional systems became reliable, this took quite a while and many of the older pilots refused to fly Proportional, they stayed with Reeds because they were bullet proof, I still have two Reed systems which I fly once in a while, they still work perfectly, fifty years old.

    Have a great day everyone.

    John Eberle

    Montgomery, TX


 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search  Web 
 
Avatar User Offline ScaleAero
Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined: September/09/2003
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 9219
IP Logged
Posted: July/27/2011 at 1:23pm  Quote
 

John,

Single stick systems are still available.

However, the legacy issue of using your oldest of the old system components is where you run aground. This is not uncommon with senior modelers
who have had little to no regional threat to their systems over the years from either commercial "72" repeaters or general population of modelers with
overlaping in 3-IM issues. 

In Texas this is common because of the abundence of land off of which to fly with minimum encrouchment. BB Weber (Bomber Field) found himself
in this circumstance year before last when he found out his legacy in-plane model set ups could no longer be utilized with multiple digital receivers
with precise clocking vs the kinda sorta close clocking of the analog equipment he used for "too long".

This is the 2nd go around for BB. The first time he gave me all his Kraft/EMS servos, receiver and transmitter modules, receivers, batteries, Noble
switch harnesses, plug extensions and electric retracts. I'm talking $3k to $4k worth. At the time I was using the last of the Signature Series Kraft
along with the black cased systems Kraft contracted from a Korean company before closing their doors. I ended up giving away 90% of everything
because of its HUGE appetite for amps.

In addition to Kraft I flew Futaba until I needed more channels and mixing diversity...sold everything and went to JR. From JR I moved to Multiplex
and now Futaba utilizing serial bus.

Just a short history review to let you know everyone has been there at some point and forced to re-invest after too many years using a legacy investment.
Single stick is available however you might have to spend more than you are willing to spend to acquire it. They tend to have greater capacity channel
wise than the average modeler is willing to invest in.



__________________
Ed
http://www.flitemetal.com
http://www.mac-models.com
 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search  Web 
 
Avatar User Offline john62544
Basic Member
Basic Member
Joined: November/19/2008
National Flag of United States United States
Posts: 877
IP Logged
Posted: July/29/2011 at 7:36pm  Quote
 

ED

    Thanks for for the advice, all of my Kraft transmitters have been updated to current standards, and as I said the Orbits all have current Futaba guts in them. I never use mutiple receivers and also do not run long servo extentions. I mount the servos as close to the receiver as opssible and use the old pushrod and bell crank method of connecting controls. I usually never run more than six channels, standard controls plus maybe Flaps and retracts. All of my battery packs are Sanyo 700 MA or 1500 to 1700 MA sub C cell packs. The fact that I don't run very long extention cables and that I don't run 8 to 12 servos in a plane probably accounts for the reason I've never had a problem with battery power or flight time.

    I hope this helps explain what I said above.

    Thank you for your comments.

    John Eberle

    Montgomery, TX


 
Back to Top  Printer Friendly Version  Profile  Search  Web 
 
]
] ]
Forum Jump 10 Pages « 9 10

 

  Post Reply   New Topic   

] ] ]
]
   ]
Similar topics you might be interested in...
Landing Gear
Landing Gear
Radio Brands
landing gear
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
]
] ]

Home Icon Portal Home   Forum Icon Forum Home   Forum Icon Your Privacy

Copyright © 2003-2024, RCSCALEBUILDER.COM, All Rights Reserved